netdev - RE: [PATCH v1 net-next 1/1] net: fec: add stop mode request on/off implemention

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BN3PR0301MB12195EFFA207302FF3569134F58D0@BN3PR0301MB1219.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:55:14 +0000
From:	Duan Andy <fugang.duan@...escale.com>
To:	Duan Andy <fugang.duan@...escale.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Li Frank <Frank.Li@...escale.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 net-next 1/1] net: fec: add stop mode request on/off
 implemention

Hi, David,

From: Duan Fugang-B38611 Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 9:28 AM
> To: 'David Miller'
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Li Frank-B20596; stephen@...workplumber.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 net-next 1/1] net: fec: add stop mode request
> on/off implemention
> 
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 7:27
> AM
> > To: Duan Fugang-B38611
> > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Li Frank-B20596;
> > stephen@...workplumber.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 1/1] net: fec: add stop mode request
> > on/off implemention
> >
> > From: Fugang Duan <b38611@...escale.com>
> > Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 18:13:43 +0800
> >
> > > The current driver depends on platform data to implement stop mode
> > > request on/off that call api pdata->sleep_mode_enable().
> > >
> > > To reduce arch platform redundancy code, since the function only set
> > > SOC GPR register bit to request stop mode of/off, so we can move the
> > > function into driver. And the specifix GPR register offset and MASK
> > > bit can be transferred from DTS.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Fugang Duan <B38611@...escale.com>
> >
> > Doesn't this break stop mode on those devices until the DTS is updated?
> >
> > That's really unfortunate, because you're leaving all of the platform
> > data and implementation there, yet it's going to be unused.
> >
> > I really think you need to keep the code using the platform data bits
> > around until all the DTSs are updated.
> >
> > No matter what you tell me about how DTSs are updated (don't even
> > mention the details, I do not care) you simply cannot keep the
> > platform data code around and not use it.  It is completely
> > nonsensible to have code that would properly function and properly
> > support a feature for the device in the kernel, yet not use it.
> >
> > Period.
> 
> Thanks for your comments.
> 
> Firstly, I will send some board dts patches (and test).
> Secondly, the net/next tree have no platform data for stop mode because
> others suggest us to use dts not platform data, and there have no any
> boards support stop mode in net/next, so this doesn't break any boards in
> net/next.
> 
> Regards,
> Andy

I remove platform data callback is because there have no any platform use stop mode function. That is to remove redundant code.

I tested the patch on 4.1 with extra patches (imx pm support patches), it works fine.
But Linux next still loss i.MX power management patches, so wakeup source cannot work in next.

So the patch itself has no problem. You can accept it now, or after imx pm patches enter to next, and then I will send it again with imx6x/7x support.

Regards,
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html