[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55B9A76A.3030908@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:26:18 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Zhangjie (HZ)" <zhangjie14@...wei.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Qinchuanyu <qinchuanyu@...wei.com>, Yewudi <yewudi@...wei.com>,
liuyongan 00175866 <l00175866@...esmail.huawei.com.cn>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Question]Why a skb with frag_list causes BUG_ON in function
skb_segment
cc netdev for more experts
On 07/28/2015 04:53 PM, Zhangjie (HZ) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I generate a skb as follows:
>
> It has a linear data region, 17 frags and the last fragment is in
> skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list.
>
> Before this skb is sent to driver, dev_hard_start_xmit() will segment
> it first(skb has frag_list,
>
> so we get true from netif_needs_gso()), then the skb is passed to
> function skb_segment().
>
> Then, BUG_ON() happened.
>
> while (pos < offset + len) {
>
> if (i >= nfrags) {
>
> BUG_ON(skb_headlen(list_skb)); (skbuff.c:3120)
>
> …
>
> }
>
> …
>
> }
>
> A skb that has no frags but frag_list also causes BUG_ON().
>
> I wonder if skb like follows is legal? Could skb in frag_list have
> linear data region?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Zhangjie
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists