[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55BBEDB6.5050600@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:50:46 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, fw@...len.de
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
daniel@...earbox.net, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] net: Assert napi_gro_cb size against skb->cb[]
On 31/07/15 13:44, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:24:03 +0200
>
>> Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On 64-bits hosts, napi_gro_cb is 48 bytes, which is exactly the size of
>>> skb->cb[], while on 32-bits hosts it is 36 bytes, but if it were to
>>> grow, we would not be catching a size inflation as we should.
>>> ---
>>> net/core/dev.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>>> index 4870c3556a5a..20bc82604b75 100644
>>> --- a/net/core/dev.c
>>> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
>>> @@ -4115,6 +4115,8 @@ static void skb_gro_reset_offset(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> const struct skb_shared_info *pinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
>>> const skb_frag_t *frag0 = &pinfo->frags[0];
>>>
>>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(skb->cb) < sizeof(struct napi_gro_cb));
>>
>> commit c3c7c254b2e8cd99b0adf288c2a1bddacd7ba255
>> already added a check for this.
>
> Indeed.
Whoops, missed that part, thanks Florian!
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists