netdev - Problem with fragmented packets on tun/tap interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPBAu3WwLLAYtRuxrA2uDF7J5-1FPfvJ-JVB1_WHNZdf1W_M=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:30:31 +0530
From:	Prashant Upadhyaya <praupadhyaya@...il.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Problem with fragmented packets on tun/tap interface

Hi,

I am having a linux user space application which gets data from an
interface (eg. eth0) using a packet socket. The application has a fast
path and a slow path. In the fast path the packets are processed by
the application and sent out via the packet socket. Certain packets
need processing by linux IP stack -- this constitutes the slow path. I
use a tun/tap interface to inject the packet into the kernel in case
it deserves slow path processing. When the kernel responds, I read the
packets back from the tap and send it out via the packet socket. I use
iptable rules to drop the packets at the entry from the interface so
that they are not processed by kernel directly (because I read them
via packet socket and then inject into the kernel via the tap
interface)
iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -j DROP
iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -j DROP

Now the above mechanism works very well for me except when the slow
path encounters fragmented IP packets. When I inject the fragmented IP
packets into the kernel via the tap interface, the kernel does
not.respond (eg. for a ping bigger than mtu size) I have checked with
tcpdump on tap that I have injected all the fragments into the kernel.

Strangely enough, the same usecase works if I put the delays (usleep)
at two places in my application --

1. Just before writing the packet to tap  (injection into the kernel)
2. Just after reading the kernel response from the tap and just before
sending the packet out using the packet socket.

The delays work for me but is clearly not good for the performance of
the slow path. And more importantly, I was looking for a fundamental
reason regarding why it works with delays and why not without it. The
issue is reproducible with a big ping (3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64)

Regards
-Prashant
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html