[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150731162018.GD899@linux>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 21:50:18 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, open list:
TI NETCP ETHERNET DRIVER <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Wingman Kwok <w-kwok2@...com>, ;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] drivers: net: Drop unlikely before IS_ERR(_OR_NULL)
On 31-07-15, 11:04, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> On 07/31/2015 04:38 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) already contain an 'unlikely' compiler flag and there
> >is no need to do that again from its callers. Drop it.
> >
>
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL() is defined as
>
> static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr)
> {
> return !ptr || IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)ptr);
> }
>
> So the unlikely() applies only to second part. Wouldn't that be a
> problem for optimization?
This is what the first patch of the series does:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2009151
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists