netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150803162529-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:37:19 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] virtio_net: add gro capability

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 06:25:17PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> Straightforward patch to add GRO processing to virtio_net.
> 
> napi_complete_done() usage allows more aggressive aggregation,
> opted-in by setting /sys/class/net/xxx/gro_flush_timeout
> 
> Tested:
> 
> Setting /sys/class/net/xxx/gro_flush_timeout to 1000 nsec,
> Rick Jones reported following results.
> 
> One VM of each on a pair of OpenStack compute nodes with E5-2650Lv3 CPUs
> and Intel 82599ES-based NICs. So, two "before" and two "after" VMs.
> The OpenStack compute nodes were running OpenStack Kilo, with VxLAN
> encapsulation being used through OVS so no GRO coming-up the host
> stack.  The compute nodes themselves were running a 3.14-based kernel.
> 
> Single-stream netperf, CPU utilizations and thus service demands are
> based on intra-guest reported CPU.
> 
> Throughput Mbit/s, bigger is better                     
>         Min     Median  Average Max
> 4.2.0-rc3+      1364    1686    1678    1938
> 4.2.0-rc3+flush1k       1824    2269    2275    2647
> 
> Send Service Demand, smaller is better                  
>         Min     Median  Average Max
> 4.2.0-rc3+      0.236   0.558   0.524   0.802
> 4.2.0-rc3+flush1k       0.176   0.503   0.471   0.738
> 
> Receive Service Demand, smaller is better.      
>         Min     Median  Average Max
> 4.2.0-rc3+      1.906   2.188   2.191   2.531
> 4.2.0-rc3+flush1k       0.448   0.529   0.533   0.692
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Tested-by: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>

Ideally this needs to also be tested on non-vxlan configs with gro in
host, to make sure this doesn't cause regressions.

But I don't see why it should: GRO overhead is pretty small if packets
don't need to be combined.

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>


> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 7fbca37a1adf..66f08f622dc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ static void receive_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
>  
>  	skb_mark_napi_id(skb, &rq->napi);
>  
> -	netif_receive_skb(skb);
> +	napi_gro_receive(&rq->napi, skb);
>  	return;
>  
>  frame_err:
> @@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>  	/* Out of packets? */
>  	if (received < budget) {
>  		r = virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(rq->vq);
> -		napi_complete(napi);
> +		napi_complete_done(napi, received);
>  		if (unlikely(virtqueue_poll(rq->vq, r)) &&
>  		    napi_schedule_prep(napi)) {
>  			virtqueue_disable_cb(rq->vq);
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html