[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55BFA6DE.7040108@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 19:37:34 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] test_bpf: allow tests to specify an skb fragment.
On 08/03/2015 06:38 PM, Nicolas Schichan wrote:
> On 08/03/2015 05:29 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 08/03/2015 04:02 PM, Nicolas Schichan wrote:
>> We now have 286 tests, which is awesome!
>>
>> Perhaps, we need to start thinking of a better test description method
>> soonish as the test_bpf.ko module grew to ~1.6M, i.e. whenever we add
>> to struct bpf_test, it adds memory overhead upon all test cases.
>
> Indeed, test_bpf.ko is turning quite large (1.4M when compiled for ARM).
>
> It looks like gzip is able to do wonders on the module though as I end up with
> a 94.7K test_bpf.ko.gz file and if the modutils are compiled with
> --enable-zlib, it will be gunziped automatically before being loaded to the
> kernel.
I think it just contains a lot of zero blocks, which then compress nicely.
> I think that marking tests[] array as __initdata will help with the runtime
> memory use if someone forgets to rmmod the test_bpf module after a completely
> successful run.
Can be done, too, yep. Do you want to send a patch? ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists