[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55BFDFF3.2030309@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 14:41:07 -0700
From: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] lwtunnel: encap locally-generated ipv4 packets
On 8/3/15, 9:39 AM, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Locally-generated IPv4 packets, such as from applications running on
> the host or traceroute/ping currently don't have lwtunnel output
> redirected encap applied. However, they should do in the same way as
> for forwarded packets and this patch series addresses that.
>
> Robert Shearman (2):
> lwtunnel: set skb protocol and dev
> ipv4: apply lwtunnel encap for locally-generated packets
>
> net/core/lwtunnel.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> net/ipv4/route.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Thanks for this patch Robert. Looks good.
I have been thinking of sending a similar patch out for this and
since i was also looking at ip fragmentation, I have a slightly
different patch which I think should also take care of
encapsulating locally generated packets too. This patch moves the output
redirection to after ip fragmentation.
What do you think about the below (I have briefly tested it. Was
planning to test some more before sending it out as RFC) ?
[PATCH net-next] lwtunnel: move output redirection to after ip fragmentation
This patch adds tunnel headroom in lwtstate to make
sure we account for tunnel data in mtu calculations and
moves tunnel output redirection after ip fragmentation.
Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
---
include/net/lwtunnel.h | 1 +
net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 4 ++++
net/ipv4/route.c | 5 +++--
net/mpls/mpls_iptunnel.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/lwtunnel.h b/include/net/lwtunnel.h
index 918e03c..7816805 100644
--- a/include/net/lwtunnel.h
+++ b/include/net/lwtunnel.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ struct lwtunnel_state {
__u16 flags;
atomic_t refcnt;
int len;
+ __u16 headroom;
__u8 data[0];
};
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
index 6bf89a6..ae3119f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
#include <net/icmp.h>
#include <net/checksum.h>
#include <net/inetpeer.h>
+#include <net/lwtunnel.h>
#include <linux/igmp.h>
#include <linux/netfilter_ipv4.h>
#include <linux/netfilter_bridge.h>
@@ -201,6 +202,9 @@ static int ip_finish_output2(struct sock *sk, struct
sk_buff *skb)
skb = skb2;
}
+ if (lwtunnel_output_redirect(rt->rt_lwtstate))
+ return lwtunnel_output(sk, skb);
+
rcu_read_lock_bh();
nexthop = (__force u32) rt_nexthop(rt, ip_hdr(skb)->daddr);
neigh = __ipv4_neigh_lookup_noref(dev, nexthop);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index d3964fa..4e07b9a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -1234,6 +1234,9 @@ static unsigned int ipv4_mtu(const struct
dst_entry *dst)
mtu = dst->dev->mtu;
+ if (lwtunnel_output_redirect(rt->rt_lwtstate))
+ mtu -= rt->rt_lwtstate->headroom;
+
if (unlikely(dst_metric_locked(dst, RTAX_MTU))) {
if (rt->rt_uses_gateway && mtu > 576)
mtu = 576;
@@ -1634,8 +1637,6 @@ static int __mkroute_input(struct sk_buff *skb,
rth->dst.output = ip_output;
rt_set_nexthop(rth, daddr, res, fnhe, res->fi, res->type, itag);
- if (lwtunnel_output_redirect(rth->rt_lwtstate))
- rth->dst.output = lwtunnel_output;
skb_dst_set(skb, &rth->dst);
out:
err = 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists