netdev - RE: RX overrun errors building on several of our hosts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <B5657A6538887040AD3A81F1008BEC63DF6D71@avmb3.qlogic.org>
Date:	Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:39:27 +0000
From:	Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
To:	Dan Finn <Dan.Finn@...nsource.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: RX overrun errors building on several of our hosts

> After implementing a new monitoring tool I've noticed that several of our
> physical servers have increasing RX errors, all seem to be classified as overruns.

Just to be sure we're looking at the same thing - are you referring to the errors
appearing on the bonding interfaces? I.e., ~10^(-6) of Rx packets are errors?
Also, how exactly do you classify such errors as overruns?

If you can, please provide `ethtool -S' and `ethtool -I' outputs for
base interfaces. Also, for good measures, please provide an `ethtool -d'
output as well.

Thanks,
Yuval
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html