netdev - Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] bpf: Implement function bpf_perf_event_read() that get the selected hardware PMU conuter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55C2332B.3010708@plumgrid.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Aug 2015 09:00:43 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net, wangnan0@...wei.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pi3orama@....com, hekuang@...wei.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] bpf: Implement function bpf_perf_event_read() that
 get the selected hardware PMU conuter

On 8/5/15 3:15 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 12:04:25PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 08:58:15AM +0000, Kaixu Xia wrote:
>
>>> +	    event->ctx->task != current)
>
> Strictly speaking we should hold rcu_read_lock around dereferencing
> event->ctx (or have IRQs disabled -- although I know Paul doesn't like
> us relying on that).

programs are always executing under rcu_read_lock, so we should be good
here too.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html