[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C26686.3010702@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:39:50 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
gospo@...ulusnetworks.com, jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com,
nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, ddutt@...ulusnetworks.com,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
hadi@...atatu.com, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, svaidya@...cade.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] net: Use VRF device index for socket lookups
Hi Tom:
On 8/5/15 12:32 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:14 AM, David Ahern<dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>> >The intent of the VRF device is to leverage the existing SO_BINDTODEVICE
>> >as a means of creating L3 domains. Since sockets are expected to be bound
>> >to the VRF device the index of the master device needs to be used for
>> >socket lookups.
>> >
> This patch set seems awfully invasive at the socket layer. Isn't there
> anyway this functionality be contained in the routing layer and
> sockets use existing API?
This patch is a leftover from earlier versions. It is no longer needed.
Will drop for v5.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists