netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net] sctp: ASCONF-ACK with Unresolvable Address should be sent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADvbK_cgaKf5nAGu-uE9NzgWpXrdHdqO82rAEWd63V9fO88M5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:34:28 +0800
From:	lucien xin <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To:	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
	davem <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] sctp: ASCONF-ACK with Unresolvable Address should
 be sent

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
<marcelo.leitner@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 01:08:08PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
>> RFC 5061:
>>     This is an opaque integer assigned by the sender to identify each
>>     request parameter.  The receiver of the ASCONF Chunk will copy this
>>     32-bit value into the ASCONF Response Correlation ID field of the
>>     ASCONF-ACK response parameter.  The sender of the ASCONF can use this
>>     same value in the ASCONF-ACK to find which request the response is
>>     for.  Note that the receiver MUST NOT change this 32-bit value.
>>
>>     Address Parameter: TLV
>>
>>     This field contains an IPv4 or IPv6 address parameter, as described
>>     in Section 3.3.2.1 of [RFC4960].
>>
>> ASCONF chunk with Error Cause Indication Parameter (Unresolvable Address)
>> should be sent if the Delete IP Address is not part of the association.
>>
>>   Endpoint A                           Endpoint B
>>   (ESTABLISHED)                        (ESTABLISHED)
>>
>>   ASCONF        ----------------->
>>   (Delete IP Address)
>>                 <-----------------      ASCONF-ACK
>>                                         (Unresolvable Address)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
>> index 06320c8..6e399f6 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
>> @@ -3090,8 +3090,19 @@ static __be16 sctp_process_asconf_param(struct sctp_association *asoc,
>>                       sctp_assoc_set_primary(asoc, asconf->transport);
>>                       sctp_assoc_del_nonprimary_peers(asoc,
>>                                                       asconf->transport);
>> -             } else
>> -                     sctp_assoc_del_peer(asoc, &addr);
>> +                     return SCTP_ERROR_NO_ERROR;
>> +             }
>> +
>> +             /* If the address is not part of the association, the
>> +              * ASCONF-ACK with Error Cause Indication Parameter
>> +              * which including cause of Unresolvable Address should
>> +              * be sent.
>> +              */
>> +             peer = sctp_assoc_lookup_paddr(asoc, &addr);
>> +             if (!peer)
>> +                     return SCTP_ERROR_DNS_FAILED;
>> +
>> +             sctp_assoc_rm_peer(asoc, peer);
>>               break;
>>       case SCTP_PARAM_SET_PRIMARY:
>>               /* ADDIP Section 4.2.4
>> --
>> 2.1.0
>>
>
> Looks good to me.
>
>   Marcelo
>

any update for this one? is it accepted?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html