netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/6] geneve: Make dst-port configurable.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALnjE+pTeKT=y1H1A77K05VaCSZ1+5zAiVKwj4q-tDiVps6=0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:17:42 -0700
From:	Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
To:	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/6] geneve: Make dst-port configurable.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com> wrote:
>>> Not specific to this patch but I think that it will make things
>>> significantly easier in the future if changelink was implemented.
>>> VXLAN has the same issue as well.
>>
>> Do you mean allow dst-port configuration only through changelink()?
>
> This would be in addition to the ability to change it at setup, as
> done by this patch.
>
> I think we should ideally allow all netlink configuration to be
> changed at runtime. Otherwise the only other choice is to delete and
> recreate the device, which is more disruptive.

ok, I will update the patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html