| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150813090117.GA13833@red-moon>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:01:17 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc: Jeremy Linton <Jeremy.Linton@....com>,
"steve.glendinning@...well.net" <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Convert smsc911x to use ACPI as well as DT
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:27:59AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 05:06:27PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> > Add ACPI bindings for the smsc911x driver. Convert the DT specific calls
> > to nonspecific device* calls, This allows the driver to work
> > with both ACPI and DT configurations. Ethernet should now work when using
> > ACPI on ARM Juno.
Last sentence does not belong in the commit log.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
>
> The code looks fine to me.
>
> Currently the compulsary DT properties seem to match the "approved" ACPI
> NIC properties from here
>
> http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/nic-request-v2.pdf
What about _DSD device specific properties (eg "smsc,save-mac-address") ?
Are we taking 1:1 translation between DT and ACPI for granted ?
I thought some process must be put in place to define the corresponding
bindings in ACPI before starting this mechanical translation or maybe
I missed something, I would like to understand.
How does the device specific _DSD definitions work in ACPI world ? Where
are they published ? How will we translate those to DT bindings if there
is need ?
Lorenzo
> Reviewed-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
>
> Thanks
>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c
> > index 959aeea..0f21aa3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c
> > @@ -59,7 +59,9 @@
> > #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> > #include <linux/of_net.h>
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > +#include <linux/property.h>
> >
> > #include "smsc911x.h"
> >
> > @@ -2362,59 +2364,46 @@ static const struct smsc911x_ops shifted_smsc911x_ops = {
> > .tx_writefifo = smsc911x_tx_writefifo_shift,
> > };
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > -static int smsc911x_probe_config_dt(struct smsc911x_platform_config *config,
> > - struct device_node *np)
> > +static int smsc911x_probe_config(struct smsc911x_platform_config *config,
> > + struct device *dev)
> > {
> > - const char *mac;
> > u32 width = 0;
> >
> > - if (!np)
> > + if (!dev)
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > - config->phy_interface = of_get_phy_mode(np);
> > + config->phy_interface = device_get_phy_mode(dev);
> >
> > - mac = of_get_mac_address(np);
> > - if (mac)
> > - memcpy(config->mac, mac, ETH_ALEN);
> > + device_get_mac_address(dev, config->mac, ETH_ALEN);
> >
> > - of_property_read_u32(np, "reg-shift", &config->shift);
> > + device_property_read_u32(dev, "reg-shift", &config->shift);
> >
> > - of_property_read_u32(np, "reg-io-width", &width);
> > + device_property_read_u32(dev, "reg-io-width", &width);
> > if (width == 4)
> > config->flags |= SMSC911X_USE_32BIT;
> > else
> > config->flags |= SMSC911X_USE_16BIT;
> >
> > - if (of_get_property(np, "smsc,irq-active-high", NULL))
> > + if (device_property_present(dev, "smsc,irq-active-high"))
> > config->irq_polarity = SMSC911X_IRQ_POLARITY_ACTIVE_HIGH;
> >
> > - if (of_get_property(np, "smsc,irq-push-pull", NULL))
> > + if (device_property_present(dev, "smsc,irq-push-pull"))
> > config->irq_type = SMSC911X_IRQ_TYPE_PUSH_PULL;
> >
> > - if (of_get_property(np, "smsc,force-internal-phy", NULL))
> > + if (device_property_present(dev, "smsc,force-internal-phy"))
> > config->flags |= SMSC911X_FORCE_INTERNAL_PHY;
> >
> > - if (of_get_property(np, "smsc,force-external-phy", NULL))
> > + if (device_property_present(dev, "smsc,force-external-phy"))
> > config->flags |= SMSC911X_FORCE_EXTERNAL_PHY;
> >
> > - if (of_get_property(np, "smsc,save-mac-address", NULL))
> > + if (device_property_present(dev, "smsc,save-mac-address"))
> > config->flags |= SMSC911X_SAVE_MAC_ADDRESS;
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > -#else
> > -static inline int smsc911x_probe_config_dt(
> > - struct smsc911x_platform_config *config,
> > - struct device_node *np)
> > -{
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > -}
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
> >
> > static int smsc911x_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > - struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > struct net_device *dev;
> > struct smsc911x_data *pdata;
> > struct smsc911x_platform_config *config = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > @@ -2478,7 +2467,7 @@ static int smsc911x_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > goto out_disable_resources;
> > }
> >
> > - retval = smsc911x_probe_config_dt(&pdata->config, np);
> > + retval = smsc911x_probe_config(&pdata->config, &pdev->dev);
> > if (retval && config) {
> > /* copy config parameters across to pdata */
> > memcpy(&pdata->config, config, sizeof(pdata->config));
> > @@ -2654,6 +2643,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id smsc911x_dt_ids[] = {
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, smsc911x_dt_ids);
> > #endif
> >
> > +static const struct acpi_device_id smsc911x_acpi_match[] = {
> > + { "ARMH9118", 0 },
> > + { }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, smsc911x_acpi_match);
> > +
> > static struct platform_driver smsc911x_driver = {
> > .probe = smsc911x_drv_probe,
> > .remove = smsc911x_drv_remove,
> > @@ -2661,6 +2656,7 @@ static struct platform_driver smsc911x_driver = {
> > .name = SMSC_CHIPNAME,
> > .pm = SMSC911X_PM_OPS,
> > .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(smsc911x_dt_ids),
> > + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(smsc911x_acpi_match),
> > },
> > };
> >
> > --
> > 2.4.3
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists