[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1439732960-3302-1-git-send-email-dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 07:49:20 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] net: Updates to netif_index_is_vrf
As Eric noted netif_index_is_vrf is not called with rcu_read_lock held,
so wrap the dev_get_by_index_rcu in rcu_read_lock and unlock.
If VRF is not enabled or oif is 0 skip the device lookup. In both cases
index cannot be the VRF master.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
---
v2:
- per Florian's suggestion keep the dev_get_by_index_rcu and wrap with
rcu_read_lock/unlock versus moving to dev_get_by_index with dev_hold/put
include/linux/netdevice.h | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index f7a6ef2fae3a..2d3cd86c5618 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3819,12 +3819,22 @@ static inline bool netif_is_vrf(const struct net_device *dev)
static inline bool netif_index_is_vrf(struct net *net, int ifindex)
{
- struct net_device *dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, ifindex);
bool rc = false;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_VRF)
+ struct net_device *dev;
+
+ if (ifindex == 0)
+ return false;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, ifindex);
if (dev)
rc = netif_is_vrf(dev);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+#endif
return rc;
}
--
2.3.2 (Apple Git-55)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists