[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150816181234.GC31357@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 20:12:35 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rhashtable-test: extend to test concurrency
Phil Sutter <phil@....cc> wrote:
> After having tested insertion, lookup, table walk and removal, spawn a
> number of threads running operations on the same rhashtable. Each of
> them will:
[..]
> + if (down_interruptible(&startup_sem))
> + pr_err(" thread[%d]: down_interruptible failed\n", tdata->id);
Why _interruptible?
Seems this should use down() instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists