netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: introduce IFF_NO_QUEUE as successor of zero tx_queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150817085121.419a1d28@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 08:51:21 +0200
From:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:	Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Cc:	brouer@...hat.com, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, fw@...len.de, cwang@...pensource.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: introduce IFF_NO_QUEUE as successor of zero
 tx_queue_len


On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:41:53 +0200 Phil Sutter <phil@....cc> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:11:57PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
[...]
> > 
> > But adding a flag risks breaking external scripts.
> 
> Could you please elaborate on this? As far as I can tell, introducing a
> separate flag is the only solution *not* breaking existing scripts. So
> if you see the rub, I would like to know where exactly it is.

I agree with Phil.  AFAIC see this approach does not break existing
scripts.

Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html