netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2: Fix bandwidth allocation for some MF modes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150817.102810.1079283414308199235.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ariel.Elior@...gic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2: Fix bandwidth allocation for some MF
 modes

From: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 08:28:25 +0300

> Management firmware tells driver in case bandwidth configuration for
> a specific function exists, but [regretably] the same field has different
> meanings depending on the multi-function mode - it can either be
> a percentile value or an actual speed.
> 
> For newer multi-function modes current logic is incorrect -
> driver understands values as actual speeds instead of percentages,
> causing the resulting chip configuration to be incorrect.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
> ---
> Hi Dave,
> 
> This is actually a bug fix - but as some of the targeted multi-function
> modes exists only in 'net-next' at this time, I'm designating this fix
> to 'net-next' as well.
> 
> Please consider applying this one.

Applied to net-next, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html