netdev - [net-next]: unable to add routes to tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1029376325.2912846.1439917035503.JavaMail.zimbra@tpip.net>
Date:	Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:57:15 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Andreas Schultz <aschultz@...p.net>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [net-next]: unable to add routes to tables

Hi,

It seems that the policy for adding routes to tables has changed between
Linux 4.2-rc6 and net-next.

In Linux main line (tested up to 4.2-rc6), with this main routing table:
# ip route show table main
...
172.28.0.0/24 dev vnf-xe1p0  proto kernel  scope link  src 172.28.0.16 

and an empty table 100, this works:

# ip route add 10.0.0.0/8 via 172.28.0.32 table 100 dev vnf-xe1p0

With net-next at commit d52736e24fe2e927c26817256f8d1a3c8b5d51a0, the
same command leads to an:

# ip route add 10.0.0.0/8 via 172.28.0.32 table 100 dev vnf-xe1p0
RTNETLINK answers: Resource temporarily unavailable

Is this expected behavior?

Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html