[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1439954830-24947-5-git-send-email-razor@blackwall.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 06:27:10 +0300
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dsa@...ulusnetworks.com, shm@...ulusnetworks.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/4] vrf: ndo_add|del_slave drop unnecessary checks
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
When ndo_add|del_slave ops are used, they're taken from the respective
master device's netdev ops, so if the master device is a VRF only then
the VRF ops will get called thus no need to check the type of the
master.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
---
drivers/net/vrf.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
index 4825c65c62fd..dbeffe789185 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vrf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
@@ -393,8 +393,7 @@ out_fail:
static int vrf_add_slave(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *port_dev)
{
- if (!netif_is_vrf(dev) || netif_is_vrf(port_dev) ||
- vrf_is_slave(port_dev))
+ if (netif_is_vrf(port_dev) || vrf_is_slave(port_dev))
return -EINVAL;
return do_vrf_add_slave(dev, port_dev);
@@ -431,9 +430,6 @@ static int do_vrf_del_slave(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *port_dev)
static int vrf_del_slave(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *port_dev)
{
- if (!netif_is_vrf(dev))
- return -EINVAL;
-
return do_vrf_del_slave(dev, port_dev);
}
--
2.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists