netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 13/13] ipv6: route: per route IP tunnel metadata via lightweight tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:27:22 +0900
From:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com>
To:	Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
CC:	hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 13/13] ipv6: route: per route IP tunnel metadata
 via lightweight tunnel

Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:17:21 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
>> Jiri Benc wrote:
>>> Allow specification of per route IP tunnel instructions also for IPv6.
>>> This complements commit 3093fbe7ff4b ("route: Per route IP tunnel metadata
>>> via lightweight tunnel").
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  include/uapi/linux/lwtunnel.h |  16 +++++++
>>>  net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c     | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/lwtunnel.h b/include/uapi/linux/lwtunnel.h
>>> index aa84ca396bcb..32a149571417 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/lwtunnel.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/lwtunnel.h
>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ enum lwtunnel_encap_types {
>>>  	LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_NONE,
>>>  	LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_MPLS,
>>>  	LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_IP,
>>> +	LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_IP6,
>>>  	LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_ILA,
>>>  	__LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_MAX,
>>>  };
>>
>> Please do not add new one in the middle of enums.
> 
> You're right generally. But this one should be okay and I did this
> deliberately: the patch adding LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_ILA was merged two days
> ago, is in net-next only, is not used by anything in user space yet.
> And I think it's better to have LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_IP and
> LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_IP6 without anything in between.

I do think you should have some descriptions.

-- 
Hideaki Yoshifuji <hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com>
Technical Division, MIRACLE LINUX CORPORATION
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html