[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bne38oj7.fsf@zoro.exoscale.ch>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:13:00 +0200
From: Vincent Bernat <vincent@...nat.im>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] veth: replace iflink by a dedicated symlink in sysfs
❦ 19 août 2015 13:00 +0200, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com> :
>> While the documentation doesn't say exactly what kind of relationship
>> iflink should represent, until a45253, only lower devices were
>> advertised this way. While veth cannot have a lower device, using iflink
>> to advertise the peer may create infinite loops in programs using iflink
>> to discover device topology.
>>
>> Instead of advertising the peer link with iflink, a symbolic link "peer"
>> is added to each peer.
>
> By removing veth_get_iflink, you're also stopping IFLA_LINK being
> advertised in netlink messages, which consequently makes impossible to
> reliably match veth peers across name spaces again. This would be a
> huge step backwards.
That's the main goal of this patch: advertising the peer link as
IFLA_LINK attribute triggers an infinite loop in userland software when
they follow iflink to discover network devices topology. iflink has
always been the index of a lower device. If a sysfs symbolic link is not
good enough, I can propose a new IFLA_PEER attribute instead.
--
How apt the poor are to be proud.
-- William Shakespeare, "Twelfth-Night"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists