[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1440079999.6610.48.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:13:19 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"ido@...ery.com" <ido@...ery.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Sharon, Sara" <sara.sharon@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/3] iwlwifi: mvm: transfer the truesize to the last
TSO segment
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 13:53 +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> I do keep the original skb: it becomes the first 802.11 packet generated
> from that LSO skb. Thing is that it will be freed first and I wanted the
> *last packet* to release the pressure on the socket.
Just change this to free it last. It is that simple.
> So I guess that skb_still_in_host_queue will still find it and avoid
> retransmissions at least until the first skb of the LSO is freed.
> But unless you are fine with releasing the pressing on the socket as
> soon as the *first* 802.11 skb is freed, I need that code.
>
> I'll try to look at dev->gso_max_size that you mentioned below. This can
> really be a game changer for me.
Honestly, if your TSO patches do not use existing infra, I will NACK
them.
If existing infra is not good enough, you have the power to change it.
Fully re-implementing TSO (or GRO) in a device driver is a non starter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists