[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN3PR0301MB12198F2E8A1D508EE4FB0419F5660@BN3PR0301MB1219.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 01:16:40 +0000
From: Duan Andy <fugang.duan@...escale.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
CC: "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 1/6] net: phy: broadcom: add bcm54220 phy ID
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 5:29 AM
> To: Duan Fugang-B38611
> Cc: shawnguo@...nel.org; David Miller; netdev; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] net: phy: broadcom: add bcm54220 phy ID
>
> 2015-08-18 22:33 GMT-07:00 Fugang Duan <b38611@...escale.com>:
> > Add bcm54220 phy ID entry.
>
> This change itself is fine, but looking at the rest of your changes, we
> are not adding an entry for this PHY in drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c, which
> means that we will bind to the Generic PHY driver, and so this looks
> sufficient, even with your fixup done in the subsequent patch.
>
Thanks for your comment.
Yes, for the phy, the driver use generic phy driver.
I see all Broadcom phy ID are defined in this file, we shouldn't define new phy id in other place.
When the phy is used more popular, I think the patch is very reasonable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fugang Duan <B38611@...escale.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/brcmphy.h | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/brcmphy.h b/include/linux/brcmphy.h index
> > 697ca77..20bed15 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/brcmphy.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/brcmphy.h
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> > #define PHY_ID_BCM5482 0x0143bcb0
> > #define PHY_ID_BCM5411 0x00206070
> > #define PHY_ID_BCM5421 0x002060e0
> > +#define PHY_ID_BCM54220 0x600d8589
> > #define PHY_ID_BCM5464 0x002060b0
> > #define PHY_ID_BCM5461 0x002060c0
> > #define PHY_ID_BCM54616S 0x03625d10
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
>
>
> --
> Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists