[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0BA3FCBA62E2DC44AF3030971E174FB32E825C41@hasmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:40:08 +0000
From: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"ido@...ery.com" <ido@...ery.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/3] iwlwifi: mvm: transfer the truesize to the last
TSO segment
On 08/20/2015 10:21 AM, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
>
>
> On 08/19/2015 11:39 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 19:17 +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
>>
>>> Hm.. how would net/core/tso.c avoid this?
>>
>> Because a driver using these helpers keep around the original LSO packet
>> and frees it normally at TX completion time.
>>
>>> I can't see anything related to truesize there.
>>> Note that this work since it is guaranteed that we release the skbs in
>>> order.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> (BTW TCP packets do not have sock_wfree as destructor but tcp_wfree(),
>>>> yet we want backpressure mostly for TCP stack (TCP Small Queues))
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am not sure I follow here.
>>> You want me to test:
>>> if (skb_gso->destructor == tcp_wfree) ?
>>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> Look for example at tcp_gso_segment() (called from skb_gso_segment())
>>
>> copy_destructor = gso_skb->destructor == tcp_wfree;
>> ...
>> /* Following permits TCP Small Queues to work well with GSO :
>> * The callback to TCP stack will be called at the time last frag
>> * is freed at TX completion, and not right now when gso_skb
>> * is freed by GSO engine
>> */
>> if (copy_destructor) {
>> swap(gso_skb->sk, skb->sk);
>> swap(gso_skb->destructor, skb->destructor);
>> sum_truesize += skb->truesize;
>> atomic_add(sum_truesize - gso_skb->truesize,
>> &skb->sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
>> }
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I checked that code using iperf and saw that I don't get into this if,
>>> but I (probably wrongly) assumed that other applications would set a
>>> flag on the socket (forgive my ignorance) that would make this if be taken.
>>
>> If you do not see skb->destructor == tcp_wfree, then something is
>> definitely wrong on your setup.
>>
>
> tcp_wfree isn't exported. I can change that. It will be a challenge for
> backport though. Hm....
>
But you seem to say that gso_skb->destructor *should* point to
tcp_wfree, so maybe testing gso_skb->destructor isn't NULL is good enough?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists