[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150820.221759.895380909053732965.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: willemb@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 00/10] socket sendmsg MSG_ZEROCOPY
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:49:25 -0400
> But there may still be others. Most obvious use case for copy
> avoidance is pure device transmit. Excluding loopback may be
> a reasonable way to initially limit the attack surface. With a flag
> NETIF_F_ZC not supported on lo.
Good luck avoiding every case where a packet can be looped back into
the machine in some way. A simple device flag is not going to do it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists