[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150821235940.GA20313@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 01:59:40 +0200
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] r8169: Add values missing in @get_stats64
from HW counters
Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@...hat.com> :
> On Aug 21 21:39, Francois Romieu wrote:
[...]
> > The code should propagate failure when both rtl8169_reset_counters and
> > rtl8169_update_counters fail.
>
> This one I don't understand. Neither failing to reset the counters nor
> failing to update the counters is fatal for the driver. So far the
> (unchanged) rtl8169_update_counters doesn't even print a log message,
I wouldn't overestimate the value of log messages vs real status return.
Users can be quite unhappy with default settings that spam their logs
(it isn't a problem in open(), it's marginaly murphy plausible from
a periodic get_stats context).
The driver can't propagate errors from the current get_stats context
where rtl8169_update_counters is used. However it can be done in
open().
> while a failing reset in rtl8169_reset_counters now does.
>
> Why is that not sufficent?
Because of the same reason(s) why this patch wants to improve things.
It isn't a showstopper.
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists