[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150824185637.GA19923@salvia>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:56:37 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Christophe Ricard <christophe.ricard@...il.com>
Cc: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>, jbenc@...hat.com,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Christophe Ricard <christophe-h.ricard@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] netlink: netlink_ack send a capped message in case of error
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:08:22AM +0200, Christophe Ricard wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> I think i understand the potential limitation of my solution.
> I saw something was proposed by Jiri Benc who pushed an additional flag to
> tell if the payload can be ignored in case of an error.
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/290976/
>
> Do you think this one is acceptable ? I am not sure to understand David
> last comment.
I think David suggests something like the (completely untested)
attached patch.
View attachment "0001-netlink-add-NETLINK_CAP_ACK-socket-option.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (3075 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists