[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1440543015-14693-1-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:50:10 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, andrew@...n.ch, linux@...ck-us.net,
jiri@...nulli.us, sfeldma@...il.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/5] net: L2 only interfaces
Hi all,
This patch series implements a L2 only interface concept which basically denies
any kind of IP address configuration on these interfaces, but still allows them
to be used as configuration end-points to keep using ethtool and friends.
A cleaner approach might be to finally come up with the concept of net_port
which a net_device would be a superset of, but this still raises tons of
questions as to whether we should be modifying userland tools to be able to
configure/query these interfaces. During all the switch talks/discussions last
year, it seemed to me like th L2-only interface is closest we have to a
"network port".
Comments, flames, flying tomatoes welcome!
Florian Fainelli (5):
net: add IFF_L2_ONLY flag
net: ipv4: Skip in_dev initialization for IFF_L2_ONLY interfaces
net: ipv6: Skip in6_dev initialization for IFF_L2_ONLY interfaces
net: dsa: Flag slave network devices with IFF_L2_ONLY
net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Allow disabling tagging protocol
drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
include/uapi/linux/if.h | 5 ++++-
net/dsa/slave.c | 1 +
net/ipv4/devinet.c | 3 +++
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 4 ++++
5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists