[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150825162433.41c111d6@urahara>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 16:24:33 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, andrew@...n.ch,
linux@...ck-us.net, jiri@...nulli.us, sfeldma@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] net: L2 only interfaces
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:50:10 -0700
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series implements a L2 only interface concept which basically denies
> any kind of IP address configuration on these interfaces, but still allows them
> to be used as configuration end-points to keep using ethtool and friends.
>
> A cleaner approach might be to finally come up with the concept of net_port
> which a net_device would be a superset of, but this still raises tons of
> questions as to whether we should be modifying userland tools to be able to
> configure/query these interfaces. During all the switch talks/discussions last
> year, it seemed to me like th L2-only interface is closest we have to a
> "network port".
>
> Comments, flames, flying tomatoes welcome!
>
> Florian Fainelli (5):
> net: add IFF_L2_ONLY flag
> net: ipv4: Skip in_dev initialization for IFF_L2_ONLY interfaces
> net: ipv6: Skip in6_dev initialization for IFF_L2_ONLY interfaces
> net: dsa: Flag slave network devices with IFF_L2_ONLY
> net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Allow disabling tagging protocol
>
> drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> include/uapi/linux/if.h | 5 ++++-
> net/dsa/slave.c | 1 +
> net/ipv4/devinet.c | 3 +++
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 4 ++++
> 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
Can you bridge these?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists