netdev - Re: iproute2: Behavioural Bug?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:48:51 +0530
From:	Akshat Kakkar <akshat.1984@...il.com>
To:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Cc:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Subject: Re: iproute2: Behavioural Bug?

Well if that is the case, then just an additional information (which I
have initially mentioned though), if hashtable is 800, then behaviour
is correct i.e. deleting only a single filter but for hash tables
other than 800, the bug (if any) gets triggered.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Akshat Kakkar <akshat.1984@...il.com> wrote:
>> Dear Florian,
>>
>> There are two filters 15:2:2 and 15:2:3 and I have deleted only
>> 15:2:3, so 15:2:2 will still be there and hence this condition
>> "destroy proto tp when all filters are gone" should not be applicable
>> over here.
>>
>
> Florian is correct, it _does_ look like this is caused by my patch,
> I guess some check in u32_destroy() isn't correct.
>
> It's late here, I will look into this tomorrow.
>
> Thanks for the report anyway!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html