[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1440518424.8932.19.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:00:24 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, jiri@...nulli.us,
edumazet@...gle.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
tom@...bertland.com, azhou@...ira.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
ipm@...rality.org.uk, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
anton@....ibm.com, nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] net: Optimize snmp stat aggregation by walking
all the percpu data at once
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 21:17 +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 08/25/2015 07:58 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> >
> > This is a great idea, but kcalloc()/kmalloc() can fail and you'll crash
> > the whole kernel at this point.
> >
>
> Good catch, and my bad. Though system is in bad memory condition,
> since fill_stat is not critical for the system do you think silently
> returning from here is a good idea?
> or do you think we should handle with -ENOMEM way up.?
Hmm... presumably these 288 bytes could be allocated in
inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs() stack frame.
Also it is weird we fill all these stats for a device we just created
and never enabled : initial stats are all 0 for them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists