[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150825175627.66ca9f30@urahara>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:56:27 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, vyasevic@...hat.com,
toshiaki.makita1@...il.com, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
wkok@...ulusnetworks.com, davem@...emloft.net,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] bridge: vlan: allow to suppress local mac
install for all vlans
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:34:55 -0700
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org> wrote:
> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
>
> This patch adds a new knob that, when enabled, allows to suppress the
> installation of local fdb entries in newly created vlans. This could
> pose a big scalability issue if we have a large number of ports and a
> large number of vlans, e.g. in a 48 port device with 2000 vlans these
> entries easily go up to 96000.
> Note that packets for these macs are still received properly because they
> are added in vlan 0 as "own" macs and referenced when fdb lookup by vlan
> results in a miss.
> Also note that vlan membership of ingress port and the bridge device
> as egress are still being correctly enforced.
>
> The default (0/off) is keeping the current behaviour.
>
> Based on a patch by Wilson Kok (wkok@...ulusnetworks.com).
This is getting messy, but then again the bridge seems to have become
a ghetto for a long time. I would rather see the lookup code fixed so
that the fdb was correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists