netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] bridge: vlan: allow to suppress local mac install for all vlans

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150825.230641.773630246486190390.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 23:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, vyasevic@...hat.com,
	toshiaki.makita1@...il.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
	bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, wkok@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] bridge: vlan: allow to suppress local mac
 install for all vlans

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 22:28:16 -0700

> Certainly, that should be done and I will look into it, but the
> essence of this patch is a bit different. The problem here is not
> the size of the fdb entries, it’s more the number of them - having
> 96000 entries (even if they were 1 byte ones) is just way too much
> especially when the fdb hash size is small and static. We could work
> on making it dynamic though, but still these type of local entries
> per vlan per port can easily be avoided with this option.

96000 bits can be stored in 12k.  Get where I'm going with this?

Look at the problem sideways.