[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55DD75FD.60509@iogearbox.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:17:01 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 5/5] net_sched: act_bpf: remove spinlock in
fast path
On 08/26/2015 05:06 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Similar to act_gact/act_mirred, act_bpf can be lockless in packet processing
> with extra care taken to free bpf programs after rcu grace period.
> Replacement of existing act_bpf (very rare) is done with synchronize_rcu()
> and final destruction is done from tc_action_ops->cleanup() callback that is
> called from tcf_exts_destroy()->tcf_action_destroy()->__tcf_hash_release() when
> bind and refcnt reach zero which is only possible when classifier is destroyed.
> Previous two patches fixed the last two classifiers (tcindex and rsvp) to
> call tcf_exts_destroy() from rcu callback.
>
> Similar to gact/mirred there is a race between prog->filter and
> prog->tcf_action. Meaning that the program being replaced may use
> previous default action if it happened to return TC_ACT_UNSPEC.
> act_mirred race betwen tcf_action and tcfm_dev is similar.
> In all cases the race is harmless.
> Long term we may want to improve the situation by replacing the whole
> tc_action->priv as single pointer instead of updating inner fields one by one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Looks good to me, thanks!
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists