[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEP_g=-YCEE_0h11vpwbdPQwRJoNgg7GvNr4xRMrBmu403BiPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:08:25 -0700
From: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
To: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 7/8] geneve: Consolidate Geneve functionality
in single module.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/geneve.c b/drivers/net/geneve.c
> index d05150c..a36a1de 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/geneve.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/geneve.c
> @@ -138,16 +164,18 @@ static void geneve_rx(struct geneve_sock *gs, struct sk_buff *skb)
> opts = ip_tunnel_info_opts(&tun_dst->u.tun_info,
> gnvh->opt_len * 4);
> memcpy(opts, gnvh->options, gnvh->opt_len * 4);
> + xnet = false;
> } else {
> /* Drop packets w/ critical options,
> * since we don't support any...
> */
> if (gnvh->critical)
> goto drop;
> + xnet = !net_eq(geneve->net, dev_net(geneve->dev));
> }
Now that devices can be placed in any namespace, I think we can't
assume that xnet is false in the first case.
> @@ -293,15 +615,13 @@ static netdev_tx_t geneve_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
[...]
> + err = geneve_build_skb(rt, skb, key->tun_flags, vni,
> + info->options_len, opts, udp_csum);
> + if (unlikely(err))
> + goto err;
[...]
> tx_error:
> - dev->stats.tx_errors++;
> dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> +err:
> + dev->stats.tx_errors++;
> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> }
I'm not sure that it makes sense to break out these error conditions -
geneve_build_skb() doesn't free the skb, so it looks like there is a
leak on failure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists