[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150827064029.GI2228@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:40:29 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: sfeldma@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com,
eladr@...lanox.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com, jiri@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 2/3] mlxsw: expose EMAD transactions statistics
via debugfs
Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 08:36:03AM CEST, davem@...emloft.net wrote:
>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:27:04 +0200
>
>> I'm not saying it is not possible, it certainly is. But I think that
>> for example rocker internals have no value to default user, he
>> should not care and he cannot find out what is going on there
>> without knowledge or rocker.c code. The question is, do we need some
>> standard interface to expose random debugging data? I don't think
>> so, I think that debugfs is exactly the tool to be used in that
>> case.
>
>If it is only interesting to rocker.c maintainer, he can keep a local
>patch he applies when he needs such a facility.
>
>This discussion is becomming circular.
>
>If it's useful, it needs a well defined interface.
>
>If it's not useful, it doesn't belong in the tree.
>
>Therefore, debugfs is useless.
Fair enough.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists