[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1440796183.11525.153.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:09:43 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kaber@...sh.net, jiri@...nulli.us, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
tom@...bertland.com, azhou@...ira.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
ipm@...rality.org.uk, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
serge.hallyn@...onical.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, anton@....ibm.com,
nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/2] net: Optimize snmp stat aggregation by
walking all the percpu data at once
On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 13:55 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 13:53 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 13:33 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > We do not bother for small struct.
> > >
> > > Here, the array is big enough that David prefers having an explicit
> > > memset() so that it clearly shows that author of this code was aware of
> > > this.
> >
> > It's 288 bytes on stack, maybe a kzalloc would be clearer too.
>
> Could you read patch history and check why this has been rejected ?
I don't see a rejection, just that the initial
submission didn't check the allocation or add
an allocation buffer via kcalloc/kzalloc to the
inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs caller and change the
snmp6_fill_stats arguments.
It could also eliminate the put_unaligned calls.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/25/114
Was there some other thread?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists