[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55E3D11B.9050303@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 21:59:23 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/3] L3 RX handler
Hi Tom:
On 8/29/15 12:02 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> To begin with, can we abstract out the need for common code to know
> about the VRF device (netif_index_is_vrf). Looking more closely at
> udp_semdmsg code, there's seems to be some potential problems:
My intention to address your udp_sendmsg comment is to rip out the
change that was added and set the source address in the VRF device
driver. Doing so ...
>
> 1) In the VRF case route lookup is being called twice for every
> unconnected packet when going through vrf path :-(
> 2) The "unconnected socket" comment is not incorrect, this path is
> taken for connected sockets also before there is a cache route
> 3) Looks like in VRF path the source address can be arbitrarily
> overwritten in the case that it is non-zero (that is non-zero, but not
> a connect socket).
... fixes the above problems for non-VRF users completely. VRF users
will still have multiple lookups but that is by design.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists