[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55E4918E.7030104@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:40:30 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Remove VRF change to udp_sendmsg
Hi Tom:
On 8/31/15 11:22 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> It's a major departure from current convention. The source address of
> the packet should be set before doing ip_send_skb. In UDP unconnected
> case ip_route_output_flow calls inet_select_addr. AKAIK there is no
> provision for not setting the source address and relying on the output
> device to do this in its transmit routine. I still think it would be
> better to call into the VRF device from inet_select_addr using an ndo
> function.
I was not disregarding your suggestion and definitely appreciate the
advice. I will look into it in time. In fact I was looking at how to
better encapsulate FIB oif changes (e.g., with ndo) on the plane home
yesterday, but those take time and seem more appropriate for 4.4.
My intention with this patch is to reign in the VRF footprint and by
extension impact for 4.3 without losing functionality. During the merge
window for 4.3 net-next will be closed and it provides a good time to
investigate abstractions like ndo handlers.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists