netdev - Re: vethpair creation performance, 3.14 versus 4.2.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55E4C79E.1060101@hp.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:31:10 -0700
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: vethpair creation performance, 3.14 versus 4.2.0

On 08/31/2015 02:29 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 8/31/15 1:48 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
>> My attempts to get a call-graph have been met with very limited success.
>>   Even though I've installed the dbg package from "make deb-pkg" the
>> symbol resolution doesn't seem to be working.
>
> Looks like Debian does not enable framepointers by default:
>
> $ grep FRAME /boot/config-3.2.0-4-amd64
> ...
> # CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is not set
>
> Similar result for jessie.

And indeed, my config file has a Debian lineage.

rick

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html