[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150903080013.GA17053@frolo.macqel>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:00:14 +0200
From: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@...q.eu>
To: Fugang Duan <b38611@...escale.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: fec: clear receive interrupts before
processing a packet
Hi Andy,
can you resubmit it, adding also my
Reported-by: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@...qel.be>
and explaining that it also prevents a complete rx blockage failure ?
Philippe
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:40:15AM +0200, Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:24:14PM +0800, Fugang Duan wrote:
> > From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
> >
> > The patch just to re-submit the patch "db3421c114cfa6326" because the
> > patch "4d494cdc92b3b9a0" remove the change.
>
> I think you should mention also the titles of the commits.
>
> And maybe send it also to stable.
> >
> > Clear any pending receive interrupt before we process a pending packet.
> > This helps to avoid any spurious interrupts being raised after we have
> > fully cleaned the receive ring, while still allowing an interrupt to be
> > raised if we receive another packet.
> >
> > The position of this is critical: we must do this prior to reading the
> > next packet status to avoid potentially dropping an interrupt when a
> > packet is still pending.
> >
> > Acked-by: Fugang Duan <B38611@...escale.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> > index 1f89c59..6bed0ff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> > @@ -1400,6 +1400,7 @@ fec_enet_rx_queue(struct net_device *ndev, int budget, u16 queue_id)
> > if ((status & BD_ENET_RX_LAST) == 0)
> > netdev_err(ndev, "rcv is not +last\n");
> >
> Could a comment be added here to avoid another future removal ?
>
> > + writel(FEC_ENET_RXF, fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT);
> >
> > /* Check for errors. */
> > if (status & (BD_ENET_RX_LG | BD_ENET_RX_SH | BD_ENET_RX_NO |
> > --
> > 1.9.1
>
> Philippe
--
Philippe De Muyter +32 2 6101532 Macq SA rue de l'Aeronef 2 B-1140 Bruxelles
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists