netdev - Re: [PATCHv4 2/5] net: phy: extend fixed driver with fixed_phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55E89D83.1090401@cogentembedded.com>
Date:	Thu, 3 Sep 2015 22:20:35 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
	Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/5] net: phy: extend fixed driver with
 fixed_phy_register()

Hello.

On 05/16/2014 06:14 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

> The existing fixed_phy_add() function has several drawbacks that
> prevents it from being used as is for OF-based declaration of fixed
> PHYs:
>
>   * The address of the PHY on the fake bus needs to be passed, while a
>     dynamic allocation is desired.
>
>   * Since the phy_device instantiation is post-poned until the next
>     mdiobus scan, there is no way to associate the fixed PHY with its
>     OF node, which later prevents of_phy_connect() from finding this
>     fixed PHY from a given OF node.
>
> To solve this, this commit introduces fixed_phy_register(), which will
> allocate an available PHY address, add the PHY using fixed_phy_add()
> and instantiate the phy_device structure associated with the provided
> OF node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/net/phy/fixed.c   | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/linux/phy_fixed.h | 11 +++++++++
>   2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/fixed.c b/drivers/net/phy/fixed.c
> index e41546d..d60d875 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/fixed.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/fixed.c
[...]
> @@ -203,6 +204,66 @@ err_regs:
[...]
> +int fixed_phy_register(unsigned int irq,
> +		       struct fixed_phy_status *status,
> +		       struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	struct fixed_mdio_bus *fmb = &platform_fmb;
> +	struct phy_device *phy;
> +	int phy_addr;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* Get the next available PHY address, up to PHY_MAX_ADDR */
> +	spin_lock(&phy_fixed_addr_lock);
> +	if (phy_fixed_addr == PHY_MAX_ADDR) {
> +		spin_unlock(&phy_fixed_addr_lock);
> +		return -ENOSPC;
> +	}
> +	phy_addr = phy_fixed_addr++;
> +	spin_unlock(&phy_fixed_addr_lock);
> +
> +	ret = fixed_phy_add(PHY_POLL, phy_addr, status);

    Was rummaging in the fixed_phy driver and a bug sprang right at me: 'phy' 
should have been passed here, not PHY_POLL. Luckily, all callers pass PHY_POLL 
anyway...

[...]

MBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html