lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8BC0F5D8-5872-4387-BACA-BE7EAF479928@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 Sep 2015 17:38:41 +0000
From:	"Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
To:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
CC:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com>,
	"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking

> On Sep 4, 2015, at 2:07 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> wrote:
> 
>> I find them useful as syntactic sugar. We have not used them a lot, but there are cases in our crypto
>> handling code where we have fixed size array inputs/outputs and there we opted to use them. They make
>> it easy to remember what the expected sizes of input and output are without having to read through the
>> implementation (of course we never even tried to use sizeof on these pointers).
>> 
>> static int smp_ah(struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm, const u8 irk[16],
>>                  const u8 r[3], u8 res[3])
> 
> Expect that it looks like you are passing arrays by value,
> but instead you are passing by reference.
> 
> Explicitly pass by reference and sizeof works.

It depends on what you mean by works. It at least doesn't look so misleading when passing by reference and so works more as expected. The sizeof in either case will never return the size of the array. To have sizeof return the size of the array would require a typedef of the array to pass by reference. In some cases that could be the right thing to do.

--
Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (842 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ