[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CB8E788@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 11:02:59 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "'Rustad, Mark D'" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
CC: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com>,
"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Network Development" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [GIT] Networking
From: Rustad, Mark D
...
> >> static int smp_ah(struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm, const u8 irk[16],
> >> const u8 r[3], u8 res[3])
> >
> > Expect that it looks like you are passing arrays by value,
> > but instead you are passing by reference.
> >
> > Explicitly pass by reference and sizeof works.
>
> It depends on what you mean by works. It at least doesn't look so misleading when passing by reference
> and so works more as expected. The sizeof in either case will never return the size of the array. To
> have sizeof return the size of the array would require a typedef of the array to pass by reference. In
> some cases that could be the right thing to do.
Feed:
int bar(int (*f)[10]) { return sizeof *f; }
into cc -O2 -S and look at the generated code - returns 40 not 4.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists