netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Network stack, first user of SLAB/kmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509081228100.26148@east.gentwo.org>
Date:	Tue, 8 Sep 2015 12:32:40 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
cc:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	iamjoonsoo.kim@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Network stack, first user of SLAB/kmem_cache
 bulk free API.

On Sat, 5 Sep 2015, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:

> The double_cmpxchg without lock prefix still cost 9 cycles, which is
> very fast but still a cost (add approx 19 cycles for a lock prefix).
>
> It is slower than local_irq_disable + local_irq_enable that only cost
> 7 cycles, which the bulking call uses.  (That is the reason bulk calls
> with 1 object can almost compete with fastpath).

Hmmm... Guess we need to come up with distinct version of kmalloc() for
irq and non irq contexts to take advantage of that . Most at non irq
context anyways.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html