lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:44:51 +0000
From:	Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To:	"sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com" 
	<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"peppe.cavallaro@...com" <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] stmmac: fix check for phydev being open

Hi Sergei,

On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 22:53 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 09/08/2015 03:46 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> 
> > > > Current check of phydev with IS_ERR(phydev) may make not much sense
> > > > because of_phy_connect() returns NULL on failure instead of error value.
> > > > 
> > > > Still for checking result of phy_connect() IS_ERR() makes perfect sense.
> > > > 
> > > > So let's use combined check IS_ERR_OR_NULL() that covers both cases.
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
> > > > Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
> > > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > Changes compared to v2:
> > > >    * Updated commit message with mention of of_phy_connect() instead of
> > > >      of_phy_attach().
> > > >    * Return ENODEV in case of of_phy_connect() failure
> > > > 
> > > > Changes compared to v1:
> > > >    * Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() instead of discrete checks for null and err
> > > > 
> > > >    drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 7 +++++--
> > > >    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > > index 864b476..e2c9c86 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > > @@ -837,9 +837,12 @@ static int stmmac_init_phy(struct net_device *dev)
> > > >    				     interface);
> > > >    	}
> > > > 
> > > > -	if (IS_ERR(phydev)) {
> > > > +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(phydev)) {
> > > >    		pr_err("%s: Could not attach to PHY\n", dev->name);
> > > > -		return PTR_ERR(phydev);
> > > > +		if (!phydev)
> > > > +			return -ENODEV;
> > > > +		else
> > > > +			return PTR_ERR(phydev);
> > > 
> > >      Don't need *else* after *return* and scripts/checkpatch.pl should have
> > > complained about that.
> > 
> > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-stmmac-fix-check-for-phydev-being-open.patch
> > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 14 lines checked
> 
>     Hm... I bet I saw such warning from checkpatch.pl recently (it was a false 
> positive though, so maybe the check was removed recently, not sure). Your 
> patch is clean indeed, however my comment is still valid.

Ok, let me send another respin then.

-Alexey--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ