[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150910.102035.936401981874229191.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com
Cc: roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: IFLA_INET6_[ICMP6]STATS
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:16:30 -0400
> On (09/10/15 10:13), David Miller wrote:
>> I don't think using such a generic netlink flag works best, the
>> IFLA_EXT_MASK is definitely more suitable.
>
> Ok, though this more of a IFLA_TRUNCATE_MASK than a IFLA_EXT_MASK.
IFLA_EXT_MASK is precisely for filtering out objects and attributes
from a netlink dump or reply, there is no reason to make a new
attribute with a different name for this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists