netdev - Re: IFLA_INET6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 20:49:43 +0530
From:	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IFLA_INET6_[ICMP6]STATS

On 09/10/2015 03:13 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 17:34:44 -0400
>
>> So the question is- who uses IFLA_INET6_STATS/IFLA_INET6_ICMP6STATS?
>> Is this intended for some ND/ripngd etc daemon?  Doesnt seem to
>> be documented in rtnetlink(7), and couldnt find any users in glibc,
>> and google did not find any usage.
>
> It doesn't really matter who uses it, it's there forever and we
> therefore can't remove it.
>
> But what we could do is add a flag in the netlink request which
> elides the stats.  GLIBC et al. could then start setting the flag.
>

+1 for this. Had similar thought. Wanted to use a flag at the higher
  level function to avoid snmp stat walk through during i/f creation.

But above idea is better.

Other idea I had was to defer the update using work queue/completion
etc..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html