[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55F294A9.9020005@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:45:29 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Tycho Andersen <tycho.andersen@...onical.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ebpf: emit correct src_reg for conditional jumps
On 09/11/2015 02:25 AM, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> Instead of always emitting BPF_REG_X, let's emit BPF_REG_X only when the
> source actually is BPF_X. This causes programs generated by the classic
> converter to not be importable via bpf(), as the eBPF verifier checks that
> the src_reg is correct or 0. While not a problem yet, this will be a
> problem when BPF_PROG_DUMP lands, and we can potentially dump and re-import
> programs generated by the converter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho.andersen@...onical.com>
> CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> CC: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
I think the description at the beginning could have been a bit clearer. I.e.
it's safe to zero insn->src_reg for BPF_SRC(fp->code) that is not X, because
we can either have X or K for classic jump compares, and in case of K we're
only interested in the immediate value, but not a possible src_reg, of course,
so eBPF converter should have zeroed it.
Yeah, it was never really the aim of the converter to cover something like
that requirement you seem to have:
load classic BPF
-> transform into eBPF
-> dump that eBPF result to uspace
-> load that eBPF via bpf(2)
Anyway, it doesn't cause an issue in the current code as stated, but it's good
if we fix it up nevertheless.
Looks good to me:
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists